The
solution to the “great omission” lies in moving from in-reach to outreach.[1] It means shifting into ‘go-mission,’ breaking
out of the ecclesial ghetto and taking the initiative to go to “the neighbor.”
This go-mission requires overcoming initial inertia. And going is messy.
The
church must go to others for they will not automatically come to the church,
meeting on the church's turf, on the church's terms.[2] It is the church's responsibility to
penetrate people in the spheres of the market- place, neighborhoods, universities, arts, and government. God calls the church not merely to gather but to scatter, exiting the building and taking the initiative to go and
meet sojourners (not-yet Christians) where they are and engage them in
meaningful conversations. Like a
football team that breaks from its huddle, the church must break from its "holy
huddle" to carry out its mission.
Charles Colson states:
We must take the church to the
people. Too often we sit in church as
spectators, waiting for the needy multitudes to come watch the show with
us. But for those in need—spiritually and
physically—a fat, lethargic church preoccupied with its own entertainment holds
no appeal. Jesus didn't set up
counseling hours in the Temple ;
He went into the homes of the most notorious sinners, to the places where the
lame, the beggars, the needy could be found.[3]
This
"go-mission" calls us to leave our comfort zones and enter various spheres of
influence. Taking the initiative demands
that we move from “the calm of the pew” into “the messiness” of people’s lives. And so we say with C. T. Studd: “Some want to
live within the sound of church or chapel bell; I want to run a rescue shop, within
a yard of hell.” And going is messy.
The
great commission will not be accomplished by timid action, or by waiting
passively for it to happen. The church
must be on the offensive but this does not mean that the church is to be
offensive. Rather, we reach out
intentionally and tactfully to those who do not know God. Boldness and gentleness are not mutually
exclusive. As John Stott said, "We carry out mission in Christ’s way."[4]
For
us, the most receptive groups to engage are found within our spheres of
influence. These comprise our everyday spaces— neighborhood,
workplace, and third places. For a local church, the most receptive population
to engage is its collective sphere of relationships. In order to do this, however, the church must
provide encouragement and opportunities for believers to build relationships
with those in their sphere of influence.
It becomes counter-productive to over-program, expecting believers to
attend several services and meetings each week to the
neglect of reaching out to others.
Rather,
believers should be encouraged to attend a worship service, a small group or
missional community, and service opportunity, with the balance of time given to
activities such as entertaining neighbors, exercising at a health club,
volunteering at a hospital, coaching a soccer team, helping with a reading
program, or participating in a local civic group. As we respond to the "go-mission," depart our comfort zones, and serve "the neighbor," a warning is in order: missional is messy!
[3]Charles
Colson, Who Speaks for God? Confronting the World with Real Christianity
(Westchester, IL: Crossway Books, 1985), 96.
[4] John
R. Stott, “A Note about the Stuttgart Statement on Evangelism” in Proclaiming Christ in Christ's Way: Studies
in Integral Mission, Vinay Samuel, Albrecht Hauser, eds. (Oxford : Regnum
Books, 1989), 208.
No comments:
Post a Comment